連載：シオニスト『ガス室』謀略の周辺事態 （その51）

ユダヤ人によるホロコースト産業批判本独訳がドイツ上陸など快挙続々

2001.2.1

　かねてより数多の欧文情報を得ながら、訳出の時間も、手頃な和訳ソフトの入手の時間も取れず、ただただ紙の山が、あちこちに古墳と化し、実のところ、そこらの阿呆なマスコミ業界の商売人などには覗かせたくもない隠棲の秘楽の壺が、増え続ける一方なのであるが、やはり、惜しいことでもある。

　それでも、本日、わがホームページ読者が届けてくれた『朝日新聞』(2001.2.10夕2面)の切抜きに、それら情報の内のたったの1つのネタが元で、中身はお粗末至極とはいえ、短い外電記事が載っていた。これは、ほんの氷山の一角にしか過ぎないが、ホロコースト見直し論の公然たるドイツ上陸の快挙が続出しているが故の禁断情報の噴出である。この件についても、わが古墳の中に欧文情報が溢れている。なお、ドイツ国内ではホロコースト見直し論は犯罪行為となっており、多くの日本の阿呆な自称平和主義者たちが、実は極右のシオニストに、まんまと騙され続けている。

　まずは、当該記事を紹介する。写真もあるが、それは、後刻、わがホームページに入れる。この熟年暴走族を、やはり年寄りなどと、なめるでない。スキャナーでカラー写真を入れることぐらいはできるのだ！

『朝日新聞』(2001.2.10夕2面)

「反ナチ運動」批判本

「ナチスのホロコーストを利用して政治、経済上の利益を得ている」とユダヤ人団体などの賠償請求運動を批判した米国の歴史学者、ノーマン・フィンケラーさん＝写真＝の著書「ホロコースト産業」ドイツ語版が出版され、記者会見がベルリンで行われた。

　両親は強制収容所に入れられたユダヤ人。しかし会見では、ドイツやスイスの企業に強制収容所での強制労働への賠償金を請求する運動を「ユダヤ人らが嫌われる最も重要な理由になっている」と批判し、「ドイツ政府は団体を通さず、直接、被害者にお金を渡すべきだ」と提言した。

　この本については「オープンな議論の契機になる」と歓迎する意見がある一方で、「ネオナチに利用される」との懸念も出ている。

（ロイター）

　いわゆるユダヤ人への賠償なるものは、これまでも一貫して、被害者や被害者の家族には渡っていなかった。すべてが、極右シオニストの偽イスラエル建国の謀略に、むしり取られ、半世紀を超える侵略の継続と、ヒトラーその退けのアラブ人大量殺戮の武器と化していたのだ。その経過は、わがホームページで無料公開中の拙著『アウシュヴィッツの争点』と拙訳『偽イスラエル政治神話』に詳しい。

➡『アウシュヴィッツの争点』
➡『偽イスラエル政治神話』

　私は、ホロコーストの嘘こそが、ネオナチの肥料になっていると批判している。ホロコーストの嘘の裏には、さらに、偽イスラエル建国の首謀者たちが元ナチ協力者だったという仰天事実までが潜んでいる。だから彼らは、過去を偽造し、言論を弾圧するのである。

　イスラエルの新しい歴史家は、偽イスラエルについて、国家が軍隊を持っているのではなくて、軍隊が国家を持っているのであり、その基本思想を「ユダヤ＝ナチズム」と批判している。新首相のリクード党首シャロンは、同党の元首相のベギン、シャミールらの子分であり、彼らは極右シオニストの本流で、これもやはり元ナチ協力者の系統の労働党よりもさらに極悪で、ナチに軍事協力さえ申し入れた対英テロリストの系統である。

　以下、手頃な英文のFinkelshtein情報を紹介する。

差出人 : Ichee@aol.com
送信日時 : 2000年 9月 7日 (木) 11:58 PM
宛先 : Mrs.Gore@whitehouse.gov
件名 : Fwded: Finkelstein

Norman Finkelstein in the Salon article points out the obvious inconsistency of the large number of alleged still-living Holocaust survivors. "The official number of Holocaust survivors the Israeli government now gives is a million. Or 960,000, to be exact.

At the same time Jewish organizations have been claiming, since the early '90s, that 10,000 die each month. So that would mean that in 1990 there were 2 million survivors left. In 1990, not more that a quarter could be alive from World War II. That means 8 million in May 1945. Well, there were fewer than 8 million Jews in all of Nazi-occupied Europe. In other words, if these numbers are correct, the Holocaust didn't happen.

As my mother used to say, if everyone who claims to be a Holocaust survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill?" For an extermination of the Jews to have taken place these survivors must be fraudulent. Finkelstein takes this position. Of course, where did all these Jews live during WWII?

http://www.salon.com/books/int/2000/08/30/finkelstein/index3.html

Salon

This is a continuation of the Finkelstein article in Salon Shoah business Aug. 30, 2000 You go a step further and argue that the "Holocaust industry" has become an even bigger Holocaust denier than the usual Holocaust deniers. How so? The official number of Holocaust survivors the Israeli government now gives is a million. Or 960,000, to be exact.

At the same time Jewish organizations have been claiming, since the early '90s, that 10,000 die each month. So that would mean that in 1990 there were 2 million survivors left. In 1990, not more that a quarter could be alive from World War II. That means 8 million in May 1945. Well, there were fewer than 8 million Jews in all of Nazi-occupied Europe. In other words, if these numbers are correct, the Holocaust didn't happen.

As my mother used to say, if everyone who claims to be a Holocaust survivor actually is one, who did Hitler kill? In 1998, Swiss banks restituted $1.25 billion to Jewish organizations for dormant Jewish accounts. Should they get their money back?

The case should have been handled by the international Claims Resolution Tribunal, instead of by the World Jewish Restitution Organization. They could have processed the claims and given out the money to those who deserve it. By the way, nobody noticed one of the most interesting revelations in the book: that banks in the U.S. also sit on dormant Jewish accounts from the war. It's not even my own finding. It's on Page 2 of the Volcker Report [the $500 million audit report on Switzerland that came out in 1999].

It amounts to $6 million, of which only $500,000 is going to be paid. In other words, the American record is worse than the Swiss! That's what Seymour Rubin, American delegate during the negotiations, testified to the House Banking Committee. Not a word reported anywhere. Not a word. What American banks are involved?

Nobody knows. We have to do a $500 million research report just like the Swiss to find out. We might never. We would be on a slow boat to Munich. You are totally opposed to the claims that are now being laid on property owned by the 3.5 million Jews who lived in Poland.

Your family is from Poland. You could get some money back after all. No! It never occurred to us. We don't want the money. My mother's father owned a little tobacco store, my father's father owned a little lumber mill. Jewish organizations are claiming back my grandparents' property without asking our permission. We never gave our sanction! It's grave robbery!

I say: Enough. The American Jewish community is rich enough. It doesn't need to evict Polish peasants from their land, Polish tenants from their homes and Polish sick from the hospitals for more money. They have plenty of money. Mr. Bronfman just sold Seagram for $27 billion. That's plenty.

You don't have to impoverish Polish people even more. What if your grandparents' lumber mill is owned not by a poor Polish family but by a wealthy former Communist apparatchik? Still not interested? That wouldn't make any difference. Have you ever been to Auschwitz? No. I've lived with the Holocaust for 40 years. That's enough. I don't need to have more of it. I'm not like one of those second-generation Holocaust victims that go lie in a gas oven. Have you seen "Schindler's List"?

I never had the nerves. I tried to see some of those films. I started with "Sophie's Choice." I left after 40 minutes. I thought it was vulgar. I didn't see Claude Lanzmann's "Shoah," but my parents saw it and they both liked it very much. Your book is meant to preserve the legacy of your parents, who both died in 1995. Would they have been pleased by the book?

My mother was one of the smartest people I've known. I put a lot of her wisdom in the book, so I think she would have liked it. I don't know about my father. He didn't say much. Perhaps both of my parents, like most Holocaust survivors, would have had a little difficulty with my views on Israel, which is perfectly understandable.

Weren't you afraid that your book would fall into the wrong hands and be used against exactly the causes you stand for? I thought about that. I recognize that problems can arise from the book. I had to do a kind of moral balancing act. I asked myself: Which poses the greater danger now, the Holocaust industry or the Holocaust deniers?

Actually, what I wanted to do is disarm the Holocaust industry and the Holocaust deniers at the same time. How are you disarming the Holocaust deniers?

Now they say: "Told you so." If David Irving [the British Holocaust denier] is saying, "Well, an Auschwitz survivor is born every day," he can say that, because if you look at the numbers of the Holocaust industry, it's true.

The way you defang the deniers is by scrupulously preserving the historical record.

The only way we can learn from the Holocaust is by restoring it as a rational object of historical inquiry, and the only way we can do that is by putting the Holocaust industry out of business.

以上で(その51)終り。(その52)に続く。