[B] バムルン・カヨタとその時代 アジアグローバリゼーションに対峙したタイ農民運動者を偲んで(上)

2 months 2 weeks ago
農業記者として国内とアジアの村を歩いて62年が過ぎた。たくさんの農民と出会い、語り合い、教えられ、行動してきた。同じように歳をとり、大切な仲間が逝ってしまう。2022年には佐賀の農民作家山下惣一を失った。23年には日本の有機農業運動の先達、山形の星寛治が世を去った。そして今年6月、タイの農民バムルン・カヨタがいなくなった。73歳の早い死だった。タイの農民運動をけん引するたぐいまれな農民運動のリーダーとして大きな足跡を残した。彼と友人付き合いを始めて36年になる。彼に連れられ、東北タイを中心にタイの村を随分歩いた。運動の最前線にも立ち会った。以下、自分なりの追悼を記した。(大野和興)
日刊ベリタ

[B] 【入管問題】全国で一斉アクション開催 入管の「送還一本やり」に反対

2 months 2 weeks ago
1月19日、人権侵害が横行する日本の入管行政に抗議するべく、全国の市民団体が一斉アクションに取り組んだ。東京・上野のアクションには、約100人(主催者発表)の学生や市民が参加。上野恩賜公園を出発したデモ隊は、「難民の人権守れ」「さべつはダメ」などと書かれたプラカードを掲げ、「監理措置制度をやめろ」「難民を送還するな」とシュプレヒコールを上げながら、昨年6月に施行された「改悪」入管法の撤廃を求めた。主催は、「入管の民族差別・人権侵害と闘う全国市民連合」。(岩本裕之)
日刊ベリタ

【焦点】40年温室効果ガス73%削減は困難、火力発電の脱炭素化進まず、50年実質排出ゼロも危うい=橋詰雅博

2 months 2 weeks ago
 経済産業省は第7次エネルギー計画(エネ基)素案とともに「地球温暖化対策(温対)計画」素案を12下旬発表した。温対素案は2040年温室効果ガス(GHG)削減の目標値を提示している。2013年と比べて73%減としているが、本当に達成できるのだろうか。 エネ基素案で40年の電源比率構成は、原発2割程度、太陽光、風力、水力など再生可能エネルギー4~5割程度、石炭、製油、天然ガスの火力発電3から4割としている。 二酸化炭素(CO2)の排出が最も多い火力発電の脱炭素化がGHG削減の最大..
JCJ

[B] 【1/19 改悪入管法撤廃!】 市民団体が全国各地で一斉アクション

2 months 2 weeks ago
昨年6月に施行された改定入管法の撤廃を求めて、1月19日に全国一斉アクションが開催される。同アクションでは、主に① 市民による監視を強制する監理措置制度の廃止、②国際基準に基づいた難民認定と在留特別許可基準の大幅緩和、③名古屋入管死亡事件の再発防止策の徹底等を求めて、東京、名古屋、大阪、広島などの全国各地で集会、デモ、スタンディングアクションなどが取り組まれる。主催は「入管の民族差別・人権侵害と闘う全国市民連合」。
日刊ベリタ

【選挙】嘆く前に自壊から始めよう 兵家県知事選SNSショック 旧メディア自爆直視=下村 健一(白鴎大学教授/元TBS報道アナウンサー)<br />

2 months 2 weeks ago
 新聞・テレビ・紙雑誌など“旧メディア”界隈の人々にショックを与えた、先月の兵庫県知事選。年越しで喉元過ぎて、来夏の参院選などでもっと大きな衝撃波を受けないように、今一度捉え直しておきたい。斎藤支持の理由 「旧メディアは嘘つき。パワハラ等は無かった」という熱烈型。「旧メディアは先走り。真相がまだわからないから、今のところ続投」という保留型。「旧メディアは一面的。パワハラ叩きばかりだが、一期目の実績を評価」という別視点型。―――斎藤元彦氏を逆転再選させた投票理由のタイプは様々だ..
JCJ

Mad at Meta? Don't Let Them Collect and Monetize Your Personal Data

2 months 2 weeks ago

If you’re fed up with Meta right now, you’re not alone. Google searches for deleting Facebook and Instagram spiked last week after Meta announced its latest policy changes. These changes, seemingly designed to appease the incoming Trump administration, included loosening Meta’s hate speech policy to allow for the targeting of LGBTQ+ people and immigrants. 

If these changes—or Meta’s long history of anti-competitive, censorial, and invasive practices—make you want to cut ties with the company, it’s sadly not as simple as deleting your Facebook account or spending less time on Instagram. Meta tracks your activity across millions of websites and apps, regardless of whether you use its platforms, and it profits from that data through targeted ads. If you want to limit Meta’s ability to collect and profit from your personal data, here’s what you need to know.

Meta’s Business Model Relies on Your Personal Data

You might think of Meta as a social media company, but its primary business is surveillance advertising. Meta’s business model relies on collecting as much information as possible about people in order to sell highly-targeted ads. That’s why Meta is one of the main companies tracking you across the internet—monitoring your activity far beyond its own platforms. When Apple introduced changes to make tracking harder on iPhones, Meta lost billions in revenue, demonstrating just how valuable your personal data is to its business. 

How Meta Harvests Your Personal Data

Meta’s tracking tools are embedded in millions of websites and apps, so you can’t escape the company’s surveillance just by avoiding or deleting Facebook and Instagram. Meta’s tracking pixel, found on 30% of the world’s most popular websites, monitors people’s behavior across the web and can expose sensitive information, including financial and mental health data. A 2022 investigation by The Markup found that a third of the top U.S. hospitals had sent sensitive patient information to Meta through its tracking pixel. 

Meta’s surveillance isn’t limited to your online activity. The company also encourages businesses to send them data about your offline purchases and interactions. Even deleting your Facebook and Instagram accounts won’t stop Meta from harvesting your personal data. Meta in 2018 admitted to collecting information about non-users, including their contact details and browsing history.

Take These Steps to Limit How Meta Profits From Your Personal Data

Although Meta’s surveillance systems are pervasive, there are ways to limit how Meta collects and uses your personal data. 

Update Your Meta Account Settings

Open your Instagram or Facebook app and navigate to the Accounts Center page. 

If your Facebook and Instagram accounts are linked on your Accounts Center page, you only have to update the following settings once. If not, you’ll have to update them separately for Facebook and Instagram. Once you find your way to the Accounts Center, the directions below are the same for both platforms.

Meta makes it harder than it should be to find and update these settings. The following steps are accurate at the time of publication, but Meta often changes their settings and adds additional steps. The exact language below may not match what Meta displays in your region, but you should have a setting controlling each of the following permissions.

Once you’re on the “Accounts Center” page, make the following changes:

1) Stop Meta from targeting ads based on data it collects about you on other apps and websites: 

Click the Ad preferences option under Accounts Center, then select the Manage Info tab (this tab may be called Ad settings depending on your location). Click the Activity information from ad partners option, then Review Setting. Select the option for No, don’t make my ads more relevant by using this information and click the “Confirm” button when prompted.

2) Stop Meta from using your data (from Facebook and Instagram) to help advertisers target you on other apps. Meta’s ad network connects advertisers with other apps through privacy-invasive ad auctions—generating more money and data for Meta in the process.

Back on the Ad preferences page, click the Manage info tab again (called Ad settings depending on your location), then select the Ads shown outside of Meta setting, select Not allowed and then click the “X” button to close the pop-up.

Depending on your location, this setting will be called Ads from ad partners on the Manage info tab.

3) Disconnect the data that other companies share with Meta about you from your account:

From the Accounts Center screen, click the Your information and permissions option, followed by Your activity off Meta technologies, then Manage future activity. On this screen, choose the option to Disconnect future activity, followed by the Continue button, then confirm one more time by clicking the Disconnect future activity button. Note: This may take up to 48 hours to take effect.

Note: This will also clear previous activity, which might log you out of apps and websites you’ve signed into through Facebook.

While these settings limit how Meta uses your data, they won’t necessarily stop the company from collecting it and potentially using it for other purposes. 

Install Privacy Badger to Block Meta’s Trackers

Privacy Badger is a free browser extension by EFF that blocks trackers—like Meta’s pixel—from loading on websites you visit. It also replaces embedded Facebook posts, Like buttons, and Share buttons with click-to-activate placeholders, blocking another way that Meta tracks you. The next version of Privacy Badger (coming next week) will extend this protection to embedded Instagram and Threads posts, which also send your data to Meta.

Visit privacybadger.org to install Privacy Badger on your web browser. Currently, Firefox on Android is the only mobile browser that supports Privacy Badger. 

Limit Meta’s Tracking on Your Phone

Take these additional steps on your mobile device:

  • Disable your phone’s advertising ID to make it harder for Meta to track what you do across apps. Follow EFF’s instructions for doing this on your iPhone or Android device.
  • Turn off location access for Meta’s apps. Meta doesn’t need to know where you are all the time to function, and you can safely disable location access without affecting how the Facebook and Instagram apps work. Review this setting using EFF’s guides for your iPhone or Android device.
The Real Solution: Strong Privacy Legislation

Stopping a company you distrust from profiting off your personal data shouldn’t require tinkering with hidden settings and installing browser extensions. Instead, your data should be private by default. That’s why we need strong federal privacy legislation that puts you—not Meta—in control of your information. 

Without strong privacy legislation, Meta will keep finding ways to bypass your privacy protections and monetize your personal data. Privacy is about more than safeguarding your sensitive information—it’s about having the power to prevent companies like Meta from exploiting your personal data for profit.

Lena Cohen

[B] 「アメリカが核の大惨事に舵を切った(ジェフリーサックス)」【西サハラ最新情報】  平田伊都子

2 months 2 weeks ago
「アメリカが私たちを世界的な核の大惨事にますます近づけていると確信している」と、コロンビア大学のジェフリー・サックス経済学教授が、2025年1月14日に放映されたアルジャジーラTVで話しました。 サックス教授はアメリカ合衆国歴代政権のみならず、国連事務総長や世界中の政府首脳の顧問も務めています。 そのサックス教授が、「ロシアが戦争を始めた最終的な責任は、ウラジーミル・プーチンではなく、米国バイデン政権にある」と、断言しました。
日刊ベリタ

EFF Statement on U.S. Supreme Court's Decision to Uphold TikTok Ban

2 months 2 weeks ago

We are deeply disappointed that the Court failed to require the strict First Amendment scrutiny required in a case like this, which would’ve led to the inescapable conclusion that the government's desire to prevent potential future harm had to be rejected as infringing millions of Americans’ constitutionally protected free speech. We are disappointed to see the Court sweep past the undisputed content-based justification for the law – to control what speech Americans see and share with each other – and rule only based on the shaky data privacy concerns.

The United States’ foreign foes easily can steal, scrape, or buy Americans’ data by countless other means. The ban or forced sale of one social media app will do virtually nothing to protect Americans' data privacy – only comprehensive consumer privacy legislation can achieve that goal. Shutting down communications platforms or forcing their reorganization based on concerns of foreign propaganda and anti-national manipulation is an eminently anti-democratic tactic, one that the US has previously condemned globally.

David Greene