The signatories of this statement highlight the need for greater, concrete commitments to ensure an open, inclusive and transparent, people-centred and rights-based approach to GDC implementation,…

平和や人権尊重を求める運動や組織が「偉人」と仰いできた人の過去の不正義を突き付けられたとき、どのような対応をしたのか。差別発言を告発された「むのたけじ地域・民衆ジャーナリズム賞」は、むのという冠を外して新たな出発をめざし […]

平和や人権尊重を求める運動や組織が「偉人」と仰いできた人の過去の不正義を突き付けられたとき、どのような対応をしたのか。差別発言を告発された「むのたけじ地域・民衆ジャーナリズム賞」は、むのという冠を外して新たな出発をめざし […]

FXC株式会社が提供するAE1021およびAE1021PEには、複数の脆弱性が存在します。

年末年始のお休みについてお知らせします。 本年の座り込みは12月27日(金)まで。 来年の1月6日(月)から再開します。 よろしくお願いいたします。 「ヘリパッドいらない」住民の会

WordPress用プラグインMy WP Customize Admin/Frontendには、クロスサイトスクリプティングの脆弱性が存在します。

No one gets to abuse copyright to shut down debate. Because of that, we at EFF represent Channel 781, a group of citizen journalists whose YouTube channel was temporarily shut down following copyright infringement claims made by Waltham Community Access Corporation (WCAC). As part of that case, the federal court in Massachusetts heard oral arguments in Channel 781 News v. Waltham Community Access Corporation, a pivotal case for copyright law and digital journalism. 

WCAC, Waltham’s public access channel, records city council meetings on video. Channel 781, a group of independent journalists, curates clips of those meetings for its YouTube channel, along with original programming, to spark debate on issues like housing policy and real estate development. WCAC sent a series of DMCA takedown notices that accused Channel 781 of copyright infringement, resulting in YouTube deactivating Channel 781’s channel just days before a critical municipal election.

Represented by EFF and the law firm Brown Rudnick LLP, Channel 781 sued WCAC for misrepresentations in its DMCA takedown notices. We argued that using clips of government meetings from the government access station to engage in public debate is an obvious fair use under copyright. Also, by excerpting factual recordings and using captions to improve accessibility, the group aims to educate the public, a purpose distinct from WCAC’s unannotated broadcasts of hours-long meetings. The lawsuit alleges that WCAC’s takedown requests knowingly misrepresented the legality of Channel 781's use, violating Section 512(f) of the DMCA.

Fighting a Motion to Dismiss

In court this week, EFF pushed back against WCAC’s motion to dismiss the case. We argued to District Judge Patti Saris that Channel 781’s use of video clips of city government meetings was an obvious fair use, and that by failing to consider fair use before sending takedown notices to YouTube, WCAC violated the law and should be liable for damages.

If Judge Saris denies WCAC’s motion, we will move on to proving our case. We’re confident that the outcome will promote accountability for copyright holders who misuse the powerful notice-and-takedown mechanism that the DMCA provides, and also protect citizen journalists in their use of digital tools.

EFF will continue to provide updates as the case develops. Stay tuned for the latest news on this critical fight for free expression and the protection of digital rights.

情報通信審議会　電気通信事業政策部会　ユニバーサルサービス政策委員会（第38回）

令和6年度地方財政審議会（12月4日）議事要旨