Federal Appeals Court Finds Geofence Warrants Are “Categorically” Unconstitutional

1 month 2 weeks ago

In a major decision on Friday, the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals held that geofence warrants are “categorically prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.” Closely following arguments EFF has made in a number of cases, the court found that geofence warrants constitute the sort of “general, exploratory rummaging” that the drafters of the Fourth Amendment intended to outlaw. EFF applauds this decision because it is essential that every person feels like they can simply take their cell phone out into the world without the fear that they might end up a criminal suspect because their location data was swept up in open-ended digital dragnet.

The new Fifth Circuit case, United States v. Smith, involved an armed robbery and assault of a US Postal Service worker at a post office in Mississippi in 2018. After several months of investigation, police had no identifiable suspects, so they obtained a geofence warrant covering a large geographic area around the post office for the hour surrounding the crime. Google responded to the warrant with information on several devices, ultimately leading police to the two defendants.

On appeal, the Fifth Circuit reached several important holdings.

First, it determined that under the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Carpenter v. United States, individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location data implicated by geofence warrants. As a result, the court broke from the Fourth Circuit’s deeply flawed decision last month in United States v. Chatrie, noting that although geofence warrants can be more “limited temporally” than the data sought in Carpenter, geofence location data is still highly invasive because it can expose sensitive information about a person’s associations and allow police to “follow” them into private spaces.

Second, the court found that even though investigators seek warrants for geofence location data, these searches are inherently unconstitutional. As the court noted, geofence warrants require a provider, almost always Google, to search “the entirety” of its reserve of location data “while law enforcement officials have no idea who they are looking for, or whether the search will even turn up a result.” Therefore, “the quintessential problem with these warrants is that they never include a specific user to be identified, only a temporal and geographic location where any given user may turn up post-search. That is constitutionally insufficient.”

Unsurprisingly, however, the court found that in 2018, police could have relied on such a warrant in “good faith,” because geofence technology was novel, and police reached out to other agencies with more experience for guidance. This means that the evidence they obtained will not be suppressed in this case.

Nevertheless, it is gratifying to see an appeals court recognize the fundamental invasions of privacy created by these warrants and uphold our constitutional tradition prohibiting general searches. Police around the country have increasingly relied on geofence warrants and other reverse warrants, and this opinion should act as a warning against narrow applications of Fourth Amendment precedent in these cases.

Related Cases: Carpenter v. United States
Andrew Crocker

【環境破壊】海はプラスチックスープ、 磯焼け、海面上昇 武本氏招き例会 「気候正義の言葉覚えて」=神奈川支部

1 month 2 weeks ago
  神奈川支部は6月29日、横浜市で支部例会を開いた。講師はプロダイバーで環境活動家の武本匡弘氏=写真=。武本氏は自ら撮影した水中画像を示し、危機的な海の環境破壊の状況を報告した。 大気中の二酸化炭素の増加による地球温暖化は、海の環境も大きく変化させた。海面温度の上昇により沖縄ではサンゴの白化が起こり、全国的には海藻が育たない「磯焼け」が広がっている。 サンゴ礁の海に住む魚はサンゴと共生しているので、太平洋の島嶼国の人々は食料危機におちいっている、とヨットでキリバスやマーシャ..
JCJ

旧優生保護法「違憲」 最高裁判決

1 month 2 weeks ago
「戦後最大の人権侵害」を断罪する歴史的な司法判断が示された。  旧優生保護法の下で不妊手術を強制されたのは憲法違反だとして、被害者らが国に損害賠償を求めた5件の訴訟の上告審で、最高裁大法廷は7月3日、旧優生保護法を「立法 […]
admin

規制庁職員トンデモ発言「原発と一般施設は同じ」 川内原発設置変更許可処分取消訴訟 

1 month 2 weeks ago
 火山活動による事故リスクが世界一高い九州電力川内原子力発電所について、火山問題のみを争点としている「川内原発設置変更許可処分取消訴訟」の第6回口頭弁論期日が7月5日、福岡高裁(松田典浩裁判長)であり、トンデモ発言が飛び […]
admin

騙しで強制不妊手術 最高裁「違憲」判決に思う

1 month 2 weeks ago
「強制不妊 最高裁『違憲』」  その報道を見た瞬間、思わず「やった!」と叫びそうになった。  7月3日、旧優生保護法をめぐる5件の訴訟の上告審で、最高裁の判決が出たのだ。旧法を「立法時点で違憲だった」とし、国に賠償を命じ […]
admin

【JCJジャーナリスト講座】学生向け 9月14日(土)~11月23日(土)・全7回 受講生募集 事前の説明会を8月18日(日)夜にオンラインで開きます!

1 month 2 weeks ago
                       力のあるジャーナリストが巣立つことを願い、日本ジャーナリスト会議(JCJ )は2011年から毎年、学生向けにジャーナリスト講座を開いています。新聞やテレビの記者はどのように取材をし、原稿を書いているのか。仕事の魅力と社会的な役割について講師にお話をしてもらっています。就活向けに「エントリーシートの書き方」など技術的なアドバイスもします。講座の趣旨:日本ジャーナリスト会議(JCJ )は9月から11月にかけ、マスコミの世界をめざす学生..
JCJ