※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※
『亜空間通信』395号(2002/10/14)
【イラク占領日本モデルNYT記事にキッシンジャー元ドイツ占領行政官でギョッ】
※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※
転送、転載、引用、訳出、大歓迎！
以下、すでに日本の大手メディアまでが一斉に報道した件で、私は、アメリカの友人から教えられた独立系情報により、一週間先んじたことを、ここで確認しておく。
http://www.asyura.com/2002/war17/msg/132.html
『亜空間通信』389号(2002/10/06)
【イラク攻撃パクス・アメリカーナの分析に日本が出てきてギョギョ！】[中略]
(2002/10/06)、いつも長文の記事を送ってくるアメリカの歴史見直し論者から届いた電子手紙には、珍しくも、「ともかく見ろ」とだけ書いてあって、それを叩くと、以下の独立系電網宝庫だった。911以来、かなり優れた分析を発表し続けている電網宝庫である。
なんで、「ともかく見ろ」というのか、その意味は、読んでみて、すぐ分かった。わが3等国家、日本が出てくるのである。
記事の主旨は、それほど珍しいものではない。イラクを狙いながら、実は全部を将棋倒し、またはドミノ倒し、ボーリングのストライクで「頂き」、「パクス・アメリカーナ」が最終目標、イラクに中東支配の基地を置くのが本音だという主旨である。
その例証として、「第2次世界大戦終了後、57年にわたって、われわれ（アメリカ）は、いまだにドイツと日本に主要な基地を置いている」(57 years after World War II ended, we still have major bases in Germany and Japan)というのである。おい、おい、小泉君、いやさ、「国家正当防衛権主張」のふわふわ君、君らは、これでも、恥ずかしいと思わんのかね。
以下、阿修羅戦争17掲示板の投稿、共同通信の短い記事と、別途入手したその源の「十一日付の米紙ニューヨーク・タイムズ」記事の原文を紹介するが、本号の表題の「キッシンジャー元ドイツ占領行政官でギョッ」の部分についてだけ、先に原文を紹介しておく。
the former secetary of state, Henry A. Kissinger, who as a young man served as a district administrator in the military government of occupied Germany
つまり、のである。
日本の天皇利用を含む占領計画は、かなり前から出来ていたのであるから、それと同じことが、イラク占領に向けて、かなり前から練られていたと考えるべきであろう。のである。ああ、ああ、ああ。
http://www.asyura.com/2002/war17/msg/213.html
10/11 17:51 米主導で軍政、戦犯裁判も 日本占領がモデルと米紙 外信87
米主導でイラクに軍政、戦犯裁判も 日本占領がモデルと米紙
投稿者 倉田佳典 日時 2002 年 10 月 11 日 21:16:10:【ニューヨーク１１日共同】十一日付の米紙ニューヨーク・タイムズは、ホワイトハウスが第二次大戦後の日本占領をモデルに、イラクのフセイン政権打倒後に米国主導の軍事政権を樹立し、戦犯裁判を実施するなどの計画を立案していると報じた。米政府高官が明らかにした。
それによると、計画では、占領行政の初期にはトミー・フランクス米中央軍司令官、あるいはその配下が「日本でのダグラス・マッカーサー将軍の役割」を担う。
占領行政は最初は軍事政権、次いで文民政権の形をとる。その後、選挙を経てイラ
この計画は、ブッシュ大統領とその側近らが選択肢を話し合って立案。まだ公式に承認されておらず、同盟諸国と協議されたかどうかも明らかではない。
タリバン政権崩壊後のアフガニスタンの混乱の二の舞いを避けるため、イラク反政府勢力の役割は当初は従来の想定より縮小する。
大統領側近らは、大量破壊兵器の捜索と破壊という主要任務を遂行する間は、米国が全面支配する意向と述べている。
イラク軍は縮小し、政府機関を掌握していたバース党高官らは排除される。
（了） ０２１０１１ １７５１
[2002-10-11-17:51]
Total Control: US Plans To Occupy Iraq And "Manage" Their Oils Fields
Oct 11, 2002
Source: New York TimesThe White House is developing a detailed plan, modeled on the postwar occupation of Japan, to install an American-led military government in Iraq if the United States topples Saddam Hussein, senior administration officials said today.
The plan also calls for war-crime trials of Iraqi leaders and a transition to an elected civilian government that could take months or years.
In the initial phase, Iraq would be governed by an American military commander perhaps Gen. Tommy R. Franks, commander of United States forces in the Persian Gulf, or one of his subordinates who would assume the role that Gen. Douglas MacArthur served in Japan after its surrender in 1945.
One senior official said the administration was "coalescing around" the concept after discussions of options with President Bush and his top aides.
But this official and others cautioned that there had not yet been any formal approval of the plan and that it was not clear whether allies had been consulted on it.
The detailed thinking about an American occupation emerges as the administration negotiates a compromise at the United Nations that officials say may fall short of an explicit authorization to use force but still allow the United States to claim it has all the authority it needs to force Iraq to disarm.
In contemplating an occupation, the administration is scaling back the initial role for Iraqi opposition forces in a post-Hussein government. Until now it had been assumed that Iraqi dissidents both inside and outside the country would form a government, but it was never clear when they would take full control.
Today marked the first time the administration has discussed what could be a lengthy occupation by coalition forces, led by the United States. Officials say they want to avoid the chaos and in-fighting that have plagued Afghanistan since the defeat of the Taliban. Mr. Bush's aides say they also want full control over Iraq while American-led forces carry out their principal mission: finding and destroying weapons of mass destruction.
The description of the emerging American plan and the possibility of war-crime trials of Iraqi leaders could be part of an administration effort to warn Iraq's generals of an unpleasant future if they continue to support Mr. Hussein.
Asked what would happen if American pressure prompted a coup against Mr. Hussein, a senior official said, "That would be nice." But the official suggested that the American military might enter and secure the country anyway, not only to eliminate weapons of mass destruction but also to ensure against anarchy.
Under the compromise now under discussion with France, Russia and China,according to officials familiar with the talks, the United Nations Security Council would approve a resolution requiring the disarmament of Iraq and specifying "consequences" that Iraq would suffer for defiance.
It would stop well short of the explicit authorization to enforce the resolution that Mr. Bush has sought. But the diplomatic strategy, now being discussed in Washington, Paris and Moscow, would allow Mr. Bush to claim that the resolution gives the United States all the authority he believes he needs to force Baghdad to disarm.
Other Security Council members could offer their own, less muscular interpretations, and they would be free to draft a second resolution, authorizing the use of force, if Iraq frustrated the inspection process. The United States would regard that second resolution as unnecessary, senior officials say. "Everyone would read this resolution their own way," one senior official said.
The revelation of the occupation plan marks the first time the administration has described in detail how it would administer Iraq in the days and weeks after an invasion, and how it would keep the country unified while searching for weapons. It would put an American officer in charge of Iraq for a year or more while the United States and its allies searched for weapons and maintained Iraq's oil fields.
For as long as the coalition partners administered Iraq, they would essentially control the second largest proven reserves of oil in the world, nearly 11 percent of the total. A senior administration official said the United Nations oil-for-food program would be expanded to help finance stabilization and reconstruction.
Administration officials said they were moving away from the model used in Afghanistan: establishing a provisional government right away that would be run by Iraqis. Some top Pentagon officials support this approach, but the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency and, ultimately, the White House, were cool to it.
"We're just not sure what influence groups on the outside would have on the inside," an administration official said. "There would also be differences among Iraqis, and we don't want chaos and anarchy in the early process."
Instead, officials said, the administration is studying the military occupations of Japan and Germany. But they stressed a commitment to keeping Iraq unified, as Japan was, and avoiding the kind partition that Germany underwent when Soviet troops stayed in the eastern sector, which set the stage for the cold war. The military government in Germany stayed in power for four years; in Japan it lasted six and a half years.
In a speech on Saturday, Zalmay Khalilzad, the special assistant to the president for Near East, Southwest Asian and North African affairs, said, "The coalition will assume and the preferred option responsibility for the territorial defense and security of Iraq after liberation."
"Our intent is not conquest and occupation of Iraq," Mr. Khalilzad said. "But we do what needs to be done to achieve the disarmament mission and to get Iraq ready for a democratic transition and then through democracy over time."
Iraqis, perhaps through a consultative council, would assist an American-led military and, later, a civilian administration, a senior official said today.
Only after this transition would the American-led government hand power to Iraqis. He said that the Iraqi armed forces would be "downsized," and that senior Baath Party officials who control government ministries would be removed. "Much of the bureaucracy would carry on under new management," he added.
Some experts warned during Senate hearings last month that a prolonged American military occupation of Iraq could inflame tensions in the Mideast and the Muslim world.
"I am viscerally opposed to a prolonged occupation of a Muslim country at the heart of the Muslim world by Western nations who proclaim the right to re-educate that country," said the former secetary of state, Henry A. Kissinger, who as a young man served as a district administrator in the military government of occupied Germany.
While the White House considers its long-term plans for Iraq, Britain's prime minister, Tony Blair, arrived in Moscow this evening for a day and a half of talks with President Vladimir V. Putin. Aides said talks were focused on resolving the dispute at the United Nations. Mr. Blair and Mr. Putin are to hold formal discussions on Friday, followed by a news conference.
Mr. Blair has been a steadfast supporter of the administration's tough line on a new resolution. But he has also indicated that Britain would consider France's proposal to have a two-tiered approach, with the Security Council first adopting a resolution to compel Iraq to cooperate with international weapons inspectors, and then, if Iraq failed to comply, adopting a second resolution on military force. Earlier this week, Russia indicated that it, too, was prepared to consider the French position.
But the administration is now saying that if there is a two-resolution approach, it will insist that the first resolution provide Mr. Bush all the authority he needs. "The timing of all this is impossible to anticipate," one administration official involved in the talks said. "The president doesn't want to have to wait around for a second resolution if it is clear that the Iraqis are not cooperating."
以上。