※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※
『亜空間通信』240号(2002/04/24)
【日本でも広がるシンシア911疑惑調査要求支持にアメリカの追撃の波を注ぐ発破】
※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※※
転送、転載、引用、訳出、大歓迎！
本通信情報と各所への投稿、わが電網宝庫記事掲載によって、「黒人女性シンシア・マケニイ米下院議員911疑惑調査要求」の電網報道は、徐々に各所で評判を呼びつつあるが、1993年のカンプチアPKO出兵反対運動で知り合った仲の神保さんが発行する『アジア国際通信』でも、以下に抄出するような紹介をしてくれた。
差出人 : melma00002570
宛先 :
送信日時 : 2002年 4月 23日 火曜日 3:01 AM
件名 : アジア国際通信 : テロと謀略とゴールド・ディナール[中略]
「９・１１事件に米政府が関与した」という疑惑を公言する米議員が現れた。
議会などでいま大きな反響を巻き起こしている。この虚構を突き破る鋭い矢を放ったのは、ジョージア州選出のシンシア・マッキーニー（民主党）という黒人女性議員であった。この発言をめぐる詳細を、『亜空間通信』の木村愛二氏が、「特集リンク」を急遽開設して報じている。ご参照いただきたい。
（http://www.jca.apc.org/~altmedka/Cynthia-McKinney.html）
「シンシアの足を引っ張る発言は、おおむね非常に下品な『あら探し』の域を出るものではない」として、独立系の声援は、「世論調査の結果は半数近くがマッキーニーの９１１謀略論支持」だという。
（http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg041202.asp）
「マッキーニー暗殺の危険」も囁かれている。[後略]
以上で引用終わり。
アメリカでも各所で、「シンシア支持の緊急の訴え」もが発せられているが、以下のごとく、米民主党そのものなのかは不明のdemocrats.com(munity)を名乗る電網宝庫情報が、独立系の転載で広がっている。
彼らは、"We Believe Cynthia!" campaign、「シンシアを信ずるキャンペーン」への賛同を求めている。その"We Believe Cynthia!"の文字入りのシンシアの新しい映像を、上記のわが「特集リンク」に掲載した。御覧頂きたい。
私は、この映像に日本語の説明を加えて拡大複写し、街頭演説にも使うし、きたる5月1日には地元のメーデーの集合地点の入り口でも、それを高く掲げて、わが「弁慶のなあ、なつ道具」持参の演説をする予定である。雨は困るが、小雨なら大丈夫のビニール張りにしてある。
皆に発破掛けて、やるぞ！
http://sf.indymedia.org/print.php?id=123533
San Francisco Bay Area Independent Media Center
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Original article is at http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2002/04/123533.phpWe Believe Cynthia
by democrats.com % Thursday April 18, 2002 at 11:52 PMWhat Did Bush Know - and When Did He Know It?
cynthia4.gif, GIF image, 150x150
In March 2002, Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) shocked the American political establishment by demanding answers to the unanswered - and even unasked - questions about September 11, then repeated her demand in an editorial in the Atlanta Journal Constitution published on April 15th:
Thoughts On Our War Against Terrorism
http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/03.29G.McKinney.War.htm
Bush Must Answer September 11th Questions
http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/opinion/0402/0415equal.htmlMcKinney made numerous points, but two of them were selected by the media for mass distribution - and distortion.
1. War Profiteering
"Persons close to this Administration are poised to make huge profits off America's new war. Former President Bush sits on the board of the Carlyle Group. The Los Angeles Times reports that on a single day last month, Carlyle earned $237 million selling shares in United Defense Industries, the Army's fifth-largest contractor. The stock offering was well timed: Carlyle officials say they decided to take the company public only after the Sept. 11 attacks. The stock sale cashed in on increased congressional support for hefty defense spending, including one of United Defense's cornerstone weapon programs."
These facts have been widely reported in the mainstream media, and have not been challenged. See Democrats.com .comments on the Carlyle Group.
2. September 11 Warnings
"Now is the time for our elected officials to be held accountable. Now is the time for the media to be held accountable. Why aren't the hard questions being asked? We know there were numerous warnings of the events to come on September 11. Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, delivered one such warning. Those engaged in unusual stock trades immediately before September 11 knew enough to make millions of dollars from United and American airlines, certain insurance and brokerage firms' stocks. What did this Administration know, and when did it know it about the events of September 11? Who else knew and why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered?"
The mainstream media has published numerous articles about warnings of an impending terrorist attack that went unheeded. For more details, visit Carolyn Kay's excellent MakeThemAccountable.com.
Rep. McKinney is not the only Member of Congress who wants an open and thorough investigation of the September 11 warnings that went unheeded. Senators Joe Lieberman (D-CT), John McCain (R-AZ), and Robert Torricelli (D-NJ) have all called for a thorough public investigation of the events and intelligence failures that led up to September 11. George Bush, Dick Cheney, and Trent Lott have adamantly opposed any public investigation. See Democrats.com .comments on September 11 Investigations.
The Smear Campaign
On April 11 2002, the Washington Post's Julie Eilperin took these two points and twisted them into a pretzel in order to accuse McKinney of blaming the Bush Administration for the September 11 attacks.
Democrat Implies Sept. 11 Administration Plot
As the text of Rep. McKinney's remarks shows, she did NOT imply September 11 was an "Administration Plot." She did not say it, she did not suggest it, and she did not even obliquely hint at it. In other words, Juliet Eilperin is LYING.
Rupert Murdoch's right-wing New York Post twisted the Washington Post's story even further.
She is demanding an investigation into her charge that Bush may have done nothing because his rich friends stood to profit from the military build-up, The Washington Post reported
McKinney did NOT charge "that Bush may have done nothing because his rich friends stood to profit from the military build-up." And since she did NOT make that charge, she is NOT "demanding an investigation into" that charge.
We Believe Cynthia!
The Washington Post, New York Post, AP, and NY Times have variously suggested that Rep. McKinney is a conspiracy theorist, crazy, pro-Iraqi, or an irresponsible publicity-seeker.
In fact, Rep. McKinney is a leading champion of human rights for blacks and all people of color, both at home and abroad. She is best known for working with conservative Republican Chris Smith (R-NJ) to enact a "code of conduct" for selling arms to dictatorial regimes. She is serving her fifth term in Congress, representing a district that was only 33% black in 1996.
The media's attempt to portray Cynthia McKinney as crazy is a repeat of the media's character assassination campaigns against Anita Hill and Lani Guinier. In all three cases, outspoken black women have been attacked for daring to express ideas that challenge the white male establishment. History has shown that both Anita Hill and Lani Guinier were telling the truth. History will also show that Cynthia McKinney is telling the truth. We believed Anita Hill and Lani Guinier - and we believe Cynthia McKinney too.
And we're taking action! We invite you to join our "We Believe Cynthia!" campaign.
1. Write letters to the media - especially those who smeared Cynthia McKinney - telling them "We Believe Cynthia!" Write to eilperinj@washpost.com and letters@nytimes.com. Send a copy to public@democrats.com and we'll publish the best ones here.
2. Post our campaign button (at the top of this page) on your Web site, with a link to this page (http://www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=270).
Thanks for your support!!
(www.democrats.com/display.cfm?id=270).
以上。