At the issue : Against the War for Easy Gain
of Military-Industrial Complex
Pre-chapter : The profile of William
D. Hartung
and his message
Chapter 1. : Translation Special Report
ABOUT FACE : The Role of the Arms Lobby
in
the Bush Administration's Radical Reversal
of Two Decades of U.S. Nuclear Policy
( World Policy Institute, Arms Trade
Resouce
Center, by William D. Hartung, with
Jonathan
Reingold )
(http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/reportaboutface.html)
Chapter 2. : Comment and Study
Bush Administration & the Revival
of
Nuclear-Military-Industrial Complex
--The Peculiar Structure of Power as
the
Base of Its Unusual Warlike Nature--
( by The Secretariat of Signature Movement
Against Koizumi & Bush )
Chapter 3. : Relevant Articles
- Increase in Military Spending and Security
Assistance Since 9/11
-- An Arms Trade Resouce Center Fact
Sheet
--
( by Michelle Ciarrocca and William
D. Hartung
)
(http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/news/SpendingDOD911.html)
- The Arms Lobby
-- Military-Industrial Complex in U.S.
Revives
in Two Decades --
( by William D. Hartung / on The Nation
)
(http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020624&s=hartung20020613)
- U.S. Arms Transfers and Security
Assistance
to Israel
-- An Arms Trade Resouce Center Fact
Sheet
--
( by William D. Hartung and Frida Berrigan
)
(http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/israel050602.html)
Chapter 4. : The Reports of the Secretariat
of Signature Movement
- Bush Administration Aims Radical Reversal
into Pre-emptive Attack Strategy, Preparing
the War on Iraq
--The Preparation of Bush's War on
Iraq and
the International Situation : Series
(3.)
on July 8 --
- The Situation about Bush's War on Iraq
after Iraq accepted‘Unconditional Inspection'
--The Preparation of Bush's War on
Iraq and
the International Situation : Series
(10)
on September 20 --
At the issue
-- Against the War for Easy Gain of Nuclear-Military-Industrial
Complex --
|
(1) What connection lies between the warlike
nature of Bush Administration and its base
of power ? We have been looking for the materials
which give answer to this question. Though
the link between Bush Administration and
military or oil industries is already pointed
out and there are many talks about it, yet
the matter hasn't been clarified concretely
and totally.
This pamphlet issued here is the first
achievement
of ours, for which we have been making
efforts
to solve the question. This is composed
of
three main parts. First, the translation
of a report by an Institute in U.S.,
which
exposed concretely and totally the
close
connection between Bush Administration
and
the nuclear-military-industrial complex
and
its arms lobby. Second, the achievement
of
our study about the revival of the
nuclear-military-industrial
complex. And last, reference materials
composed
of some relevant articles and our reports.
On starting functioning, Bush Administration
set forth one after another its policies,
which are now famous as 'unilateralism';
reversal of policy on China into regarding
it with hostility, driving Missile
Defence
(MD) forward, withdrawal from ABM Treaty,
breaking away from Kyoto-Protocol and
abandoning
obligation of cutting down CO2 once
agreed,
reversal into driving nuclear power
stations
and developing oil fields in Alaska,
and
so on. These are all plainspoken policies
which give priority to profits of military
or oil industries.
Bush Administration with the militaristic
and reactionary nature fanged Afghanistan
after 9.11, and is recklessly driving
forward
the preparation of war on Iraq with
persistent
enthusiasm like a fever, which is getting
more and more unforgivable. It is of
urgent
necessity to figure out deeply and
criticize
strictly the driving force of Bush's
war,
especially in order to stop the pressing
invasion into Iraq.
(2) This spring, when Bush's war began
to
head for Iraq clearly, we started our
study
on the connection between Bush Administration
and the military-industrial complex
and began
the work of searching internet, but
from
the first we were faced with the 'wall'.
We could find few writings or reports
about
this problem not only in Japanese but
also
in English websites. To be exact, we
found
a lot of small articles but not detailed
proven studies or exposes backed up
by the
facts.
Meanwhile we eventually reached a series
of reports by World Policy Institute's
Arms
Trade Resource Center on Peddlers of
Proliferation.
'ABOUT FACE : The Role of the Arms
Lobby
in the Bush Administration's Radical
Reversal
of Two Decades of U.S. Nuclear Policy",
which we translated here, is the most
detailed
analysis of all.
William D. Hartung, who is the writer
of
this report and the President's Fellow
at
the WPI and ATRC, is an expert on the
arms
trade and military spending, and have
released
a lot of important articles and books
since
1980s.
The report, published in May 2002,
not only
exposes the present state of Bush Administration,
but also describes vividly the process
in
which the military-industial complex
eventually
got to take over Bush Administration
; the
complex was on the verge of decline,
scale-down
and reorganization in the early 1990s
because
of the collapse of the Soviet Union,
but
found out 'new enemies', promoted the
reversal
of U.S. nuclear policy, shifted its
weight
to MD and small-sized nuclear weapons,
and
at last grasped the administration.
According to Mr. Hartung, the ultra-hawkish
ideologues really running Bush Administration
such as Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz,
Bolton,
and Rice, were deprived of any chance
during
the Clinton administration, yet their
decline
became notable as early as in the late
1980s
during the second Reagan administration,
when the nuclear disarmament negotiations
began between the United States and
the Soviet
Union.
(3)"Comment and Study" is
our trying
to sketch the nuclear-military-industrial
complex in trial-and-error, touched
off by
Mr. Hartung's reports. We tried to
clarify
the physical base of the Bush Administration's
war policy, which is the simple question
we hold strongly within the secretariat
of
Signature Movement; why is Bush driven
into
so unusual invasion and so unusual
military-adventurism?
In particular we tried to describe
the process
in which the nuclear-military-industrial
complex has vigorously revived from
the way
of decline, scale-down and reorganization.
We also tried to grasp the newest figure
of this revived complex in various
aspects
both quantitatively and qualitatively.
Because
of our study having included almost
all the
things we studied, the points of argument
may be a little confused or indistinct.
We
hope each section will be read as a
document
respectively.
(4) We are tackling the task to stop Bush's
war on Iraq as the most significant for the
time being. We selected two relevant reports
of ours and put them in this pamphlet. They
are part of a series of reports which we
estimated internal and international situation
then and there in order to strengthen our
movement while Bush Administration was pushing
ahead the preparation of war on Iraq. We
hope they will also be discussed.
The role of antiwar peace movements
in Japan
and in the world is very significant
now.
The coming war on Iraq is not different
in
its conditions from the former Gulf
War,
the war on Afghanistan, or the aerial
bombing
on former Yugoslavia. Because this
time it
is not only the aerial bombing, the
combats
in the desert, or the combats in the
caves
and non-crowded area. The main battle
is
the street-fighting in the cities which
are
crowded with some 4 million people.
The harder
the Iraqi camp resists, the greater
the damage
of the residents in the dense cities
will
be. Most of all we are afraid of reappearances
of the massacre in Jenin here and there.
What will become of the area around
the cities,
if Depleted Uranium (DU) ammunition
is spread
there ? We are afraid very much. 500,000
or 1,000,000 children, who are weak,
have
already been killed under the economic
sanctions.
What situation will come out, if the
street-fights
begin in the cities ? We must stop
Bush's
war on Iraq at any cost, and must not
allow
our own government to participate in
this
extremely cruel war, the reckless and
unlawful
war of invasion.
(5) Our firm conviction from the studies
of Mr.Hartung's and our own is this
; Bush
Administration and the nuclear-military-industrial
complex are inseperable, as well as
Bush
Administration and the oil majors are.
They
are an integrated body. It doesn't
mind,
for the purpose of making money, whatever
may happen about the children in Iraq,
moreover
about the lives and life of the people
in
Middle East, Asia, Africa, Latin America,
and the developing countries all over
the
world, who suffer from starvation and
poverty.
For making money of the oil majors,
it doesn't
mind the earth and human beings going
to
ruin by the earth warming. That is,
Bush
Administration is the largest threat
and
the worst enemy against the world peace,
the earth environment and the survival
of
human beings. Therefore, unless Bush
Administration
is overthrown first, the world peace
as well
as the survival of human beings will
never
be possible, and the destruction of
the earth
environment will be unavoidable.
(6) We asked Mr. Hartung to let us
have permission
to translate and publish his report
and articles,
and he gave us his willing permission.
We
are very grateful to him. And at the
same
time we respect Mr. Hartung and World
Policy
Institute with the persistant and systematic
studies and exposes in U.S.
This pamphlet is the continuation of
'HOW
MANY PEOPLE DID U.S. KILL IN AFGHANISTAN
!?", which we published in order
to
expose the damage by Bush's war on
Afghanistan,
and is to condemn the very core persons
of
the administration that commited the
unprecedented
war crimes. At the same time we got
to feel
keenly more and more that we essencially
need to study the relationship between
Bush
Administration and the oil-energy industry
so as to clarify its warlike nature.
We are
to issue the third pamphlet about it.
We do reject the war only to let the
nuclear-military-industrial
complex and 'peddlers of death' get
easy
gain and fatten. We do reject the war
only
to let the oil majors persue profits
and
rights and interests of oil. We do
reject
the dirty war in which they unconcernedly
kill people, ignore the international
laws,
and do all sorts of things. We do hope
this
pamphlet will be practically used to
stop
the war on Iraq among all the citizens
who
long for the world peace. We hope opinions,
criticizms, encouragements and so on
from
the readers.
October, 2002.
The Secretariat of Signature Movement
|