Subject: [fem-women2000 332] WA : June 5 : For an Inclusive World (fwd)
From: lalamaziwa <lalamaziwa@jca.apc.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2000 09:01:26 -0400
Seq: 332



Forwarded by lalamaziwa <lalamaziwa@jca.apc.org>
---------------- Original message follows ----------------
 From: karen banks <karenb@gn.apc.org>
 To: Multiple recipients of list <b5ngonews@lists.sn.apc.org>
 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 07:23:12 +0200
 Subject: [B5NGONEWS] WA : June 5 : For an Inclusive World
--

For an inclusive world
Irene Le/ ALAI/WA2000

Neither the globalised world, in which this millennium was born, nor any 
local space, can be understod today, without visualizing the changes 
brought about by women$BCT(B participation.  Among many things, women have 
inserted a focus of inclusivity into the world agenda.  This conveys an 
ethical vision that promotes human solidarity as a principle of universal 
advancement of civilization.

This proposal is so self-evident that the Community of Nations has been 
pressed to take it seriously, by taking steps to reconceptualise rights, 
naming them and focusing on a significant range of mechanisms and plans, 
designed to make gender relationships more human.  These refer both to 
macro-social aspects, such as economic relations, and to matters that until 
recently were considered domestic, and therefore insubstantial for 
international policy, such as sexuality and reproduction.

Over the last 25 years, the UN has had to move forward in qualitative 
terms.  It has fine tuned its instruments, including criteria that bring 
the universality and indivisibility of rights to a concrete terrain.  This 
process has included the four World Conferences on Women, celebrated in the 
last quarter century, the creation of specialised mechanisms dedicated to 
the universal promotion of women$BCT(B rights, and at the national scale, the 
creation of mechanisms incorporating a gender focus.

But the UN is not a neutral body.  It is subject to the ups and downs of 
its member states, of the power relations between them, of their individual 
and collective inconsistencies, which move them to agree in one room and 
disagree in another.  This ambivalence becomes patent in the case of 
women$BCT(B rights.  The Vienna $B(B93(B $BConference(B $Brecognized(B $Bthem(B $Bas(B $Bhumarights(B
$Bwhosimplementation(B $Bis(B $Blinked(B $Bto(B $Bissues(B $Bof(B $Bpeace,(B $BwhilthSecurity(B 
$BCounciwherpoweis(B $Bhyperconcentratecontinueto(B $Bacundebellicos(B
$Bperspective.(B

$BThUNas(B $Bthfirsbody(B $Bdesignated(B $Bto(B $Bexercise(B $Bglobal(B $Bgovernance(B
$Bjustifieitexistencthrougthpromotioof(B  $Bdemocracy.(B  $BBu(B
$Bironicallywithin(B $Bitowstructurit(B $Bdisplays(B $Bthlimitationof(B $Ban(B 
$Bandrocentric(B $Bvision(B $Bof(B $Bdemocracy.(B $BAn(B $Bexamplwoulbe(B $Bthrestrictions(B 
$Bimposeon(B $Bthparticipation,(B $Bor(B $Beven(B $Bthpresenceof(B $Bnumerous(B $Bwome$BCT(B 
organizations at this session.

Similarly, the UN International Financial Institutions, especially the 
World Bank, IMF and WTO turn their backs to the protection of the common 
good and they persevere in promoting an exclusively market regime. They 
exert pressure on those who persist in the idea of redistribution of wealth 
and resources, or who resist their $BEI(Bigher goal$B(B(B $Bof(B $Bthfree(B $Bcirculatioof(B 
$Bgoodancapital.(B

$BUndethesparametresquestionof(B $Beconomic(B $Bansocial(B $Bjusticfowome(B
$Bin(B $Bwage(B $Bparityworkeducation,(B $Bhealth(B $Bamonothersarreduceto(B $Bbein(B
$Bgood(B $Bintentions(B $Bwhicthmarketleader(B $Bof(B $Bthexcludinglobalized(B 
$Bdynamic,(B $Bis(B $Bsupposed(B $Bto(B $Bprovide.(B

$BFothis(B $Bvery(B $Breasonin(B $Bthcontexof(B $Bthis(B $Bform(B $Bof(B $Bglobalisation,(B $Bit(B 
$Bbecomemore(B $Bimportanthan(B $Bever(B $Bto(B $Bstrengthen(B $Bthmechanisms(B $Banassign(B 
$Bresourcefoconcretising(B $Bwome$BCT(B rights, which is a key theme of this 
UNGASS session.


=====================================================================
                   GreenNet Limited/GreenNet Educational Trust
       Bradley Close, 74-77 White Lion Street, London, N1 9PF, England
                           e-mail: support@gn.apc.org
                   tel: +44/171-713-1941  fax: +44/171-837-5551
     =====================================================================





 _________________________________________________________________________
 fem-Women2000@jca.apc.org for Women 2000, UN Special Session on Beijing+5
 Searcheable Archive http://www.jca.apc.org/fem/news/women2000/index.shtml
 visit fem-net HomePage for other mailing lists http://www.jca.apc.org/fem

Return to Index
Return to fem-women2000 HOME